Closed rsbivand closed 3 years ago
Is simply copying the comment the right thing to do when the object is being subsetted?
Ah, I see, on top level objects comment()
is TRUE
or FALSE
, indicating whether they're set on the individual multipolygons.
Any possibility of merging this and preparing an sp submission? I'd like the next sp after this and the next rgdal releases to flip the lost datum warnings option from "all"
to "none"
, but I'd like the cumulated sp fixes out first. I don't see any revdep problems.
Next after that might be the spatstat coercion methods?
Thanks, will submit soon!
BDRs revdep for FlexScan showed that the simple-features comment on an sp polygons object was lost when subsetting, and this was needed to avoid
sf::st_as_sfc()
callingrgeos::createSPComment()
. Please check that this makes sense.