Closed trentm closed 3 years ago
I am applying this change now for the Java agent, just want to clarify: we decided to ignore the stage
when constructing context.service.origin.name
because it should already be included in the path
, is that correct?
Because from @basepi's comment, it can be understood as if the intention is to reverse the order of stage
and path
when constructing the name.
we decided to ignore the
stage
when constructingcontext.service.origin.name
because it should already be included in thepath
, is that correct?
Correct.
This was a change that I'd asked about in https://github.com/elastic/apm/pull/542 discussion, but I merged that PR before adding the suggested change.
Repeating my question/suggestion from the earlier PR:
The (long) rendered table cell is viewable here: https://github.com/elastic/apm/blob/lambda-clarifications2/specs/agents/tracing-instrumentation-aws-lambda.md#api-gateway-v1--v2