Closed kix closed 5 years ago
It can certainly be improved. In the meantime, have a look at this: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/guide/master/denormalization-concurrency.html
@kix may I ask you to reword the title and description of this issue and use less aggressive words. I'd appreciate if you could use terminology like Path hierarchy tokenizer doc is not helpful
, needs to be improved
, misses usecase
. We are trying hard to get docs out there that are helpful as much as we try to continuously improve communication, please help me! :)
@s1monw, done :)
@kix thanks man!
@s1monw, sorry for being a bit harsh, but sometimes when you're looking for a solution, you certainly hope that the doc will help.
@kix not a big deal description looks much better and I can tell you there is suddenly more motivation to fix that :)
Pinging @elastic/es-search-aggs
Need to pull relevant information into the ref from the Definitive Guide.
Closing as this is addressed
I think it might be improved further. There's only an example of how to use that field to filter. I would be interested in:
Elasticsearch version: current
JVM version: irrelevant
OS version: irrelevant
Description of the problem including expected versus actual behavior:
The official documentation for path hierarchy tokenizer lacks usecase descriptions, as well as examples on performing filtering or aggregations on such fields. There is no explanation on why would anyone use this tokenizer.
Expected: the doc should explain why would I be using the tokenizer, and how do I aggregate/filter/etc. for the fields that use it.
Steps to reproduce: Doc issue, so no steps here.