Closed HarshCasper closed 2 years ago
Why MIT? Apache 2.0 is preferred for Enarx.
Why MIT? Apache 2.0 is preferred for Enarx.
I had a discussion with @nickvidal yesterday and he mentioned that we should use MIT License since Docusaurus uses MIT as well.
Is the licence applied to Docusaurus scripts/code or to the information it's serving? If the latter, then I don't think we should change the default for Enarx, which is Apache 2.0, without good reason.
Is the licence applied to Docusaurus scripts/code
Yes, and since the code is going to remain mostly the same, we should keep it as MIT.
As for the content, should we adopt Creative Commons Attribution 4.0?
Nick -
On Thu, 2021-12-09 at 03:20 -0800, Nick Vidal wrote:
Is the licence applied to Docusaurus scripts/code Yes, and since the code is going to remain mostly the same, we should keep it as MIT.
Makes sense, thanks.
As for the content, should we adopt Creative Commons Attribution 4.0?
I suggest you raise this in the #general chat.
-Mike
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
-- Mike Bursell - CEO, Profian
Excellent. I've already talked with Harsh and we'll be making some important changes to our Docs workflow so that it's more automated, but will be merging this PR for now. Thank you @HarshCasper for all the help!
Description
This PR: