Open seabbs opened 3 years ago
Does that show up in the simulation? I'd assume people tweak Rt according to what they see. If that is the case I'd argue it is not that much of an issue
No, it doesn't hence mentioning it as if it did as you say not a problem.
Intuitively I'd have a small preference for removing the control parameter (if we think it makes a meaningful difference). I'm not sure people will be able to understand what it does and what effect it has and it would be easiest if the app was as close as posisble to WYSIWYG. Do you think the divergence in methodology would pose a problem? Maybe should have a quick chat about this
its the pop arg supplied to rt_obs
and it needs to be updated in the Rt fit model object prior to use in the app but after use for forecasting Rt via the model.
In the Rt model the R estimate has population adjustment beyond the forecast horizon. This means that what you see for Rt in the forecast will actually slightly reduce as susceptibility reduces over time. There are two options. 1. Remove the control parameter so this is not the case (this will induce a divergence with the normal Rt model or 2. flag this to users.