Closed mikec closed 6 years ago
Thanks! Will review today.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 9, 2018, at 4:39 AM, Coveralls notifications@github.com wrote:
Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 71a6b29 on mikec:fix-promises into 7a75bfc on ethjs:master.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
Will review tomorrow.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 9, 2018, at 4:39 AM, Coveralls notifications@github.com wrote:
Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 71a6b29 on mikec:fix-promises into 7a75bfc on ethjs:master.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
This and other things have been addressed in 2.0 @mikec thanks for the PR regardless!
This change to ethjs-query https://github.com/ethjs/ethjs-query/commit/dd1d1b29dc80a31da86704ae840ebdd4acf0e812 will not return a promise if any callback function is passed. This breaks promise returns for
.new()
, since this was always passing a function through to the ethjs-querysendTransaction
call. With this commit, the callback function will only be passed tosendTransaction
if a callback was defined.ethjs-contract
Thank you for contributing! Please take a moment to review our contributing guidelines to make the process easy and effective for everyone involved.
Please open an issue before embarking on any significant pull request, especially those that add a new library or change existing tests, otherwise you risk spending a lot of time working on something that might not end up being merged into the project.
Before opening a pull request, please ensure:
Be kind to code reviewers, please try to keep pull requests as small and focused as possible :)
IMPORTANT: By submitting a patch, you agree to allow the project owners to license your work under the terms of the MIT License.