Closed rjperry611 closed 6 years ago
Hi @rjperry611, sorry for the delay. I finally had a chance to test this and everything still seems to be in working order, so that's great. I think this is a great addition that allows people to extend the generator without needing to put their code into the generator itself. Thanks again for the contribution! I'll try to get this merged shortly.
Hi. My team and I really like your library and have found it to be useful for our purposes. We wanted the ability to be able to define some custom type handlers that are too specific to include in your code. I figured that other users might also find this functionality useful so that's the reason for the pull request. Let me know if you see any issues with it.