Week 4 grading

[evmyclipz]

Rohan M- 2.7+/3 & Mr. M's grade - 2.8/3 Explanation: Rohan made an iteration mini-lab with 3 examples of using 2-D arrays, and also implemented his own hexadecimal code on spring-boot Ritvik K- 2.7/3 & Mr. M's grade - 2.7/3 Explanation: He has the FRQ but had some parts missing in the iteration and didn't complete the spring-boot application. Dylan Luo - 2.7/3 & Mr. M's grade - 2.7/3 Explanation: He finished the FRQ answer and did the iteration Aryan Shah - /3 Explanation: Yet to be graded.

[somaditya1]

Overall Group Grade: 2.7 This grade is deserving because of the following attributes: -Multiple FRQs have been implemented, signifying both key learning and effort -In depth explanation of code, proving a thorough understanding of the FRQs. -Scrum Board signifying collaboration. -2D Arrays illustrated and are solid. -Some technical difficulties and presentation was very long. Some presenters came unprepared.

[Adi-K-Coding]

Good personal touch combining basketball with arrays Good explanations on 2D array iteration, cool addition of springboot for rohan. The addition of a scrum board shows organization.

[boply]

Total: 2.8

• Good use of scanner class for one of the fastpages blogs.
• Good explanation of the FRQ with concise code.
• Hexidecimal code on spring-boot was an excellent addition.
• Scrum board as well showed collaboration.

[jm1021]

Ritvik - BBall hoop on iterations. Change ASCII art only. FRQ was a book class. Here much more passionate on description and understanding of problem. Dylan - Did an Anime. discussed complexity of arrays in arrays. FRQ challenge seemed more complicated than most FRQs with play game and getting things to run. Showed good usage of arrays. Rohan - Horizontal printed, but discussed unresolved error (perhaps lenght using [0] for column). Discussed learnings and ability to mutate. Discussed hacks questions. Discussed getScore FRQ, talked about adjustments to FRQ to make it run. Did input and change on Spring.

Started scrum board.

2.7 Ritvik and Dylan 2.8 Rohan

[PrishaB]

Overall: 2.7/3

Good effort! You got all the requirements and I liked how you presented the information. Code was also good. I would say maybe to help with timing a bit, try running through the presentation in advance so that you are a bit more prepared, otherwise good job!

[saumyapalk23]

I thought your basketball hoop and target arrays were pretty cool! I think it's interesting how you guys explained the object-oriented part of your programs. I thought it was cool how you incorporated a custom variable to fix the error in your FRQ code, and how you guys did the 2022 FRQ, which a lot of groups did not do. Also, the hexadecimal conversion was pretty cool. The score loop and game incorporated into the anime array were super creative.

[aaditgupta21]

• I like the basketball hoops in the 2D Array lab
• Good job on FRQ Explanation. It was very thorough
• Scrum board was a good idea to help with collaboration

2.7/3

[TianbinLiu]

Not bad

Some had good explanations for his work, but some need more explanations for his work, more talk Need more description and commend for the code All work is completed, get all requirements Can't see pair work, everyone just did his own work and presented it individually on different pages.

[aaravarora01]

Score: 2.7/3

Interesting addition of hex on spring portfolio. FRQ answers could have been more in depth. Overall understanding was shown by all members of the group

[xXAASXx]

Overall Score: 2.7/3

• I liked the personalization of a basketball hoop for Ritvitk's array
• The explanations had a great impact on understanding and learning the code completed.
• Each person did a good job explaining an array.
• I also loved how much each FRQ was expanded on.

[ghost]

2.7/3 Lots of effort in the frqs and arrays and the explanations were well explained. Like the addition of a scrum board and aws