Open joelnitta opened 2 years ago
Since the workflow now uses fixed versions of both taxonomic data and genbank data (each downloaded from NCBI FTP servers), there is less uncertainty about how a given name might be treated between different accessions. So at least we can be confident in the treatment of a name for a given context.
In the
/note="authority:
field.For example, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1996759179
The original submission has
/note="authority: Pteris inaequalis (Fee) Jenman"
, which is a valid name (maybe... valid synonym according to POW, illegal according to IPNI)NCBI applies the name "Pteris inaequalis C.Presl", which is invalid.
For now, map Pteris inaequalis C.Presl to Pteris inaequalis (Fee) Jenman.