[DataCap Application] L&M design lab-Shanghai Limu architectural planning and Design Co., Ltd

[LMdesignlab]

Large Dataset Notary Application

To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.

Core Information

• Organization Name: L&M design lab （Shanghai Limu architectural planning and Design Co., Ltd）上海立木建筑规划设计有限公司

• Website / Social Media:https://www.limu.design/

  

• Total amount of DataCap being requested (between 500 TiB and 5 PiB):5PiB

• Weekly allocation of DataCap requested (usually between 1-100TiB):200TiB

• On-chain address for first allocation:f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.

Project details

Share a brief history of your project and organization.

LiveMore was first suggested by the owner Ms. Zhang Xiaoqing in 2018, which can be literally translated as "more life", but it is obviously not what existed in our values at that time, "more life"? No, we need to "work more", explore the boundary between creativity and technology, and make the designs all over the world.
The epidemic has changed the world. The two years 2020-2021 are not only the instantaneous deceleration of the global ties we used to be familiar with, but also the last Carnival of high growth in the world. The Spring Festival in 2022 is particularly quiet, but all kinds of clues are showing that the era of 996 is coming to an end. Starting from this year, people will increasingly recognize local values and return to the origin of life. Driven by this feeling, we decided to restart this wonderful journey called atelier LiveMore.
Atelier LiveMore is an advanced customized studio dedicated to exploring space art and life aesthetics. Exploring the meaning of life is easy to move towards emptiness, but it is relatively easy to grasp the anchor point of life - children and pets, who bring people the most happiness after tired work, and their real needs are often neglected in space art. Our deep accumulation in the field of children and pets enables design to surpass art and aesthetics and truly serve all users.We design homes for all kinds of people. Some homes are as small as 13 steps, and others are as big as a luxury resort hotel. There are adults, children, cats and dogs in these homes. These lives are simple, or rich, or soup, water, or daily necessities. However, regardless of space geometry, we all want to be closer to nature, closer to truth and closer to happiness. Perhaps this is the value that LiveMore wants to convey.

What is LiveMore? 
Life is elsewhere, 
life is everywhere.

What is the primary source of funding for this project?

L&M design lab.

What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?

L&M design lab and our business customers.

Use-case details

Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin

From our project data.

Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?

Project data
design scheme
Project design drawing
Design rendering
Rendering video of renderings
Relevant image data after the completion of the project.

Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1fYlL2u6pMAMCEZEm0Lh7ywW48kotBgNw?usp=sharing
https://www.limu.design/yunshe/index

Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).

Yes, we hope more people can see our design works.

What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?

Once a year.

For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?

Hope to keep it forever.

DataCap allocation plan

In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?

Asia.

How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?

Both online and offline transmission are supported, depending on the requirements of each sp.

How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.

1. If it is an SP in China, we will conduct KYC audit on the SP and judge the legality and compliance of the sp
2. We will pay attention to the operating experience of sp. if they have rich experience, they will become bonus items.
3. SP needs to support retrieval

How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?

Distribute under filplus rules.
And try to make the SPS more dispersed. Choose different SPS in multiple regions for backup, with 5-8 copies

Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?

We are ready to store funds.

[large-datacap-requests[bot]]

Thanks for your request!

Heads up, you’re requesting more than the typical weekly onboarding rate of DataCap!

[large-datacap-requests[bot]]

Thanks for your request! Everything looks good. :ok_hand:

A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.

[raghavrmadya]

Unable to certain legitimacy using the current website. Please send an email from an official account, not limuarch@163.com, to filplus-app-review@fil.org

[raghavrmadya]

How long have you been in operation? Many projects listed on your website show other firms as lead architects with further investigation. Please provide evidence for at least 3 projects listed on your site that you have delivered and associated data samples.

[LMdesignlab]

Hello Sir @raghavrmadya Thank you for your reply

On the first question

The foreign business e-mail that our company has been using is:“ limuarch@163.com ”, you can see this through our website and social media account.

I don't quite understand what you mean about this part，Maybe you can get some answers through this link. https://www.gooood.cn/company/limu-design-studio?lang=cn

How long have you been in operation? Many projects listed on your website show other firms as lead architects with further investigation. Please provide evidence for at least 3 projects listed on your site that you have delivered and associated data samples.

1. 2021-Convenience store in Beijing

For some data about this project, you can see the details through this link.There are some planning plans, design drawings, effect rendering drawings and final photos of the project.

2. 2018-Stage over the Landscape, Neobay Administrative Service Center

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19oC9DNsM9PSHfXRN14dJMOFEKgL6XL6l?usp=sharing

[Sunnyiscoming]

https://aiqicha.baidu.com/detail/compinfo?pid=xlTM-TogKuTwMR1ObcPsq*vTgWtCeYAdkQmd&rq=ef&pd=ee&from=ps Is this link related with your organization?

[LMdesignlab]

@Sunnyiscoming
The organization shown in this link is our company

[raghavrmadya]

Data samples only have press releases. Please share 5 examples each of - Project data design scheme Project design drawing Design rendering Rendering video of renderings Relevant image data after the completion of the project.

[LMdesignlab]

Hi Sir @raghavrmadya Thank you for your reply We have prepared information related to 5 project cases, please check

Tip: because what we share is the link to the network disk in China, you may not be able to open it. However, we are talking about uploading the data to Google cloud disk for inspection

链接: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1D38ysmsvtnv9kAopKN6gUg 提取码: 9vc7 复制这段内容后打开百度网盘手机App，操作更方便哦

It is worth adding that we are also in contact with many SP technology service providers. Because we are engaged in traditional industries, we need more complete technical service solutions to store data in filecoin with their help. Including great heat, new web group, origin storage, etc Some SPS we are docking are: f090387 f01609999 f01658888 f0149768 f019362 f066104 f0469055 f01128206

[LMdesignlab]

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1JPvcQhKJxx9xav0U3nFLoN5KYxJXl_Wq?usp=sharing

[raghavrmadya]

Your data samples still word files and jpg. 5 PiBs is a LOT of data and I don't have enough confidence that you have that much data. That said, I will let notaries decide.

[large-datacap-requests[bot]]

Deleting comment

@raghavrmadya hasn't the permissions to post this comment.

Please, contact the assignee of this issue.

[raghavrmadya]

Datacap Request Trigger

Total DataCap requested

5PiB

Expected weekly DataCap usage rate

200TiB

Client address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

[large-datacap-requests[bot]]

DataCap Allocation requested

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

DataCap allocation requested

100TiB

[newwebgroup]

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacedvyu6tefzyy26p4ce5arsykbdvz73izy3r36f5lz4vnkgzorxxw2

Address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

Datacap Allocated

100.00TiB

Signer Address

f1e77zuityhvvw6u2t6tb5qlnsegy2s67qs4lbbbq

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedvyu6tefzyy26p4ce5arsykbdvz73izy3r36f5lz4vnkgzorxxw2

[Tom-OriginStorage]

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacecrv5ltuyg36c4kzla7khbmgheimm7c6e5c5lvyxucdtv5v3uwxmm

Address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

Datacap Allocated

100.00TiB

Signer Address

f1q6bpjlqia6iemqbrdaxr2uehrhpvoju3qh4lpga

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecrv5ltuyg36c4kzla7khbmgheimm7c6e5c5lvyxucdtv5v3uwxmm

[BDE-io]

@LMdesignlab Hi! Great to see you have gotten approval for DataCap. If you are looking for storage providers to store these data or have any questions, please visit #bigdata-exchange on Filecoin Slack or reply here.

We have strong demand from a diverse group of SPs, who are actively looking to onboard more data.

[large-datacap-requests[bot]]

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 2

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

DataCap allocation requested

200TiB

Id

f1519137-196d-4eb3-9f07-3348cf6c07e5

[large-datacap-requests[bot]]

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

Last two approvers

llifezou & newwebgroup

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

100% of weekly dc amount requested

DataCap allocation requested

200TiB

Total DataCap granted for client so far

100TiB

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (5PiB)

4.90PiB

Stats

Number of deals	Number of storage providers	Previous DC Allocated	Top provider	Remaining DC
2523	4	100TiB	31.67	6.09TiB

[filplus-checker-app[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

• Organization: L&M design lab （Shanghai Limu architectural planning and Design Co., Ltd）上海立木建筑规划设计有限公司
• Client: f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

  Approvers

  1newwebgroup
  1Tom-OriginStorage

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Since this is the 2nd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:

• Storage provider should not exceed 90% of total datacap.
• Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
• Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
• All storage providers should be located in different regions.

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01964215	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN CHINANET-BACKBONE	30.34 TiB	33.97%	30.34 TiB	0.00%
f01981603	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK HONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED	24.72 TiB	27.68%	24.72 TiB	0.00%
f01920091	Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE The Constant Company, LLC	16.56 TiB	18.54%	16.56 TiB	0.00%
f01777788	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK UNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED	17.69 TiB	19.80%	17.69 TiB	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Since this is the 2nd allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:

• No more than 90% of unique data are stored with less than 2 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
56.19 TiB	56.19 TiB	1	62.91%
16.56 TiB	33.13 TiB	2	37.09%

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Approvers
f1gk7n4ckn23ix2bu7q6qtas6eayambn57ass2zfq	Suzhou Qudoufeng Network Technology Co., Ltd.	64.00 GiB	2	11ane-1 1ipfscn 2kernelogic 1liyunzhi-666 1NDLABS-OFFICE 3newwebgroup 2stcouldlisa 3Tom-OriginStorage

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[kernelogic]

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzaceadjsyfvkl6c7mdns7f5nerd5rdd27n5wenrosjwc6qembdecyyss

Address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

Datacap Allocated

200.00TiB

Signer Address

f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa

Id

f1519137-196d-4eb3-9f07-3348cf6c07e5

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceadjsyfvkl6c7mdns7f5nerd5rdd27n5wenrosjwc6qembdecyyss

[kernelogic]

Early stage of allocation. Checker bot looks OK.

[YuanHeHK]

There is no problem with the number of SPs and data checks, but your data is too centralized, which is not in line with the filecoin principle. I will support you this time, but you need to adjust the subsequent packaging to ensure that the data is evenly distributed. In addition, there are 64 data sharing, which is very small and seems to be negligible operational errors.

[YuanHeHK]

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacea4rx5brvlmkikur7r32doelz46s3pvdyasdgb55ptrxheqsqwcmi

Address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

Datacap Allocated

200.00TiB

Signer Address

f1fg6jkxsr3twfnyhdlatmq36xca6sshptscds7xa

Id

f1519137-196d-4eb3-9f07-3348cf6c07e5

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacea4rx5brvlmkikur7r32doelz46s3pvdyasdgb55ptrxheqsqwcmi

[large-datacap-requests[bot]]

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 3

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

DataCap allocation requested

400TiB

Id

0da82a1e-aec7-4ddb-8b07-869ef0981244

[large-datacap-requests[bot]]

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

Last two approvers

fireflyHZ & kernelogic

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

200% of weekly dc amount requested

DataCap allocation requested

400TiB

Total DataCap granted for client so far

100TiB

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (5PiB)

4.90PiB

Stats

Number of deals	Number of storage providers	Previous DC Allocated	Top provider	Remaining DC
3200	4	200TiB	31.22	0B

[filplus-checker-app[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

• Organization: L&M design lab （Shanghai Limu architectural planning and Design Co., Ltd）上海立木建筑规划设计有限公司
• Client: f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

  Approvers

  1kernelogic
  1newwebgroup
  1Tom-OriginStorage
  1YuanHeHK

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:

• Storage provider should not exceed 50% of total datacap.
• Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
• Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
• All storage providers should be located in different regions.

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01964215	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN CHINANET-BACKBONE	30.47 TiB	30.79%	30.47 TiB	0.00%
f01981603	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK HONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED	24.72 TiB	24.98%	24.72 TiB	0.00%
f01920091	Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE The Constant Company, LLC	21.50 TiB	21.72%	21.50 TiB	0.00%
f01777788	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK UNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED	22.28 TiB	22.51%	22.28 TiB	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:

• No more than 50% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

⚠️ 100.00% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
55.97 TiB	55.97 TiB	1	56.55%
21.50 TiB	43.00 TiB	2	43.45%

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Approvers
f1gk7n4ckn23ix2bu7q6qtas6eayambn57ass2zfq	Suzhou Qudoufeng Network Technology Co., Ltd.	64.00 GiB	2	11ane-1 1ipfscn 2kernelogic 1liyunzhi-666 1NDLABS-OFFICE 3newwebgroup 2stcouldlisa 3Tom-OriginStorage

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[Tom-OriginStorage]

checker:manualTrigger

[filplus-checker-app[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

• Organization: L&M design lab （Shanghai Limu architectural planning and Design Co., Ltd）上海立木建筑规划设计有限公司
• Client: f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

  Approvers

  1kernelogic
  1newwebgroup
  1Tom-OriginStorage
  1YuanHeHK

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:

• Storage provider should not exceed 50% of total datacap.
• Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
• Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
• All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 44.87% of total deal sealed by f01920091 are duplicate data.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01964215	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN CHINANET-BACKBONE	30.47 TiB	21.19%	30.47 TiB	0.00%
f01529999	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK HK Broadband Network Ltd.	8.75 TiB	6.08%	8.75 TiB	0.00%
f01981603	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK HONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED	24.72 TiB	17.19%	24.72 TiB	0.00%
f01920091	Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE The Constant Company, LLC	39.56 TiB	27.51%	21.81 TiB	44.87%
f01777786	Ōi, Saitama, JP The Constant Company, LLC	10.50 TiB	7.30%	10.50 TiB	0.00%
f01777785	Singapore, Singapore, SG UCLOUD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED	7.53 TiB	5.24%	7.53 TiB	0.00%
f01777788	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK UNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED	22.28 TiB	15.49%	22.28 TiB	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Since this is the 4th allocation, the following restrictions have been relaxed:

• No more than 50% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

⚠️ 75.32% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
64.41 TiB	64.41 TiB	1	44.78%
10.97 TiB	29.34 TiB	2	20.40%
3.66 TiB	14.56 TiB	3	10.13%
7.19 TiB	35.50 TiB	4	24.68%

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Approvers
f1gk7n4ckn23ix2bu7q6qtas6eayambn57ass2zfq	Suzhou Qudoufeng Network Technology Co., Ltd.	64.00 GiB	2	11ane-1 1ipfscn 2kernelogic 1liyunzhi-666 1NDLABS-OFFICE 3newwebgroup 2stcouldlisa 3Tom-OriginStorage

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[Tom-OriginStorage]

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacec3pgww6qmf43dxluxuyll6xmkqcnpexgco7wfesumleu2hyircuc

Address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

Datacap Allocated

400.00TiB

Signer Address

f1q6bpjlqia6iemqbrdaxr2uehrhpvoju3qh4lpga

Id

0da82a1e-aec7-4ddb-8b07-869ef0981244

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacec3pgww6qmf43dxluxuyll6xmkqcnpexgco7wfesumleu2hyircuc

[LMdesignlab]

Thank you for your signature support, Notary Public

About CID Sharing Sorry, this is due to operational errors. We have made corrections, and the sharing situation has not spread further. About SP dispersion improvement We plan to add 3 - 5 SPs in the next two rounds to make the data more dispersed.

[1ane-1]

I checked Github's history and CID Checker's conclusions, and it looks ok. The Client has already explained some problems, and the Client said that it will continue to optimize, so it is willing to support this round.

[1ane-1]

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzaced7hr4trk2vr3fket7col2qk76q6umqex7niwqhhoaivkkh7gmn6e

Address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

Datacap Allocated

400.00TiB

Signer Address

f1mdk7s2vntzm6hu35yuo6vjubtrpfnb2awhgvrri

Id

0da82a1e-aec7-4ddb-8b07-869ef0981244

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaced7hr4trk2vr3fket7col2qk76q6umqex7niwqhhoaivkkh7gmn6e

[herrehesse]

Dear Applicant,

Due to the increased amount of erroneous/wrong Filecoin+ data recently, on behalf of the entire community, we feel compelled to go deeper into datacap requests. Hereby to ensure that the overall value of the Filecoin network and Filecoin+ program increases and is not abused.

Please answer the questions below as comprehensively as possible.

Customer data

• Could you demonstrate exactly how and to what extent customer contact occurred?

We expect that for the onboarding of customers with the scale of an LDN there would have been at least multiple email and perhaps several chat conversations preceding it. A single email with an agreement does not qualify here.

• Did the customer specify the amount of data involved in this relevant correspondence?

• Why does the customer in question want to use the Filecoin+ program?

Should this only be soley for acquiring datacap this is of course out of the question. The customer must have a legitimate reason for wanting to use the Filecoin+ program which is intended as a program to store useful and public datasets on the network.

• Why is the customer data considered Filecoin+ eligible?

(As an intermediate solution Filecoin offers the FIL-E program or the glif.io website for business datasets that do not meet the requirements for a Filecoin+ dataset)

Files and Processing

• Could you please demonstrate to us how you envision processing and transporting the customer data in question to any location for preparation?
• Would you demonstrate to us that the customer, the preparer and the intended storage providers all have adequate bandwidth to process the set with its corresponding size?
• Would you tell us how the data set preparer takes into account the prevention of duplicates in order to prevent data cap abuse?

Hopefully you understand the caution the overall community has for onboarding the wrong data. We understand the increased need for Filecoin+, however, we must not allow the program to be misused. Everything depends on a valuable and useful network, let's do our best to make this happen. Together.

[large-datacap-requests[bot]]

DataCap Allocation requested

Request number 4

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

DataCap allocation requested

800TiB

Id

29b4f45e-8e12-4643-8821-0d76b8f2d04f

[large-datacap-requests[bot]]

Stats & Info for DataCap Allocation

Multisig Notary address

f01858410

Client address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

Last two approvers

1ane-1 & llifezou

Rule to calculate the allocation request amount

400% of weekly dc amount requested

DataCap allocation requested

800TiB

Total DataCap granted for client so far

300TiB

Datacap to be granted to reach the total amount requested by the client (5PiB)

4.70PiB

Stats

Number of deals	Number of storage providers	Previous DC Allocated	Top provider	Remaining DC
17149	10	400TiB	19.34	80.21TiB

[filplus-checker-app[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

• Organization: L&M design lab （Shanghai Limu architectural planning and Design Co., Ltd）上海立木建筑规划设计有限公司
• Client: f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

  Approvers

  11ane-1
  1kernelogic
  1newwebgroup
  2Tom-OriginStorage
  1YuanHeHK

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

• Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
• Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
• Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
• All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 26.75% of total deal sealed by f01777788 are duplicate data.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01771695	Wuhan, Hubei, CN CHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone	14.56 TiB	2.64%	14.56 TiB	0.00%
f01964215	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN CHINANET-BACKBONE	30.47 TiB	5.51%	30.47 TiB	0.00%
f01924827	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK Diyixian.com Limited	26.69 TiB	4.83%	26.69 TiB	0.00%
f01529999	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK HK Broadband Network Ltd.	32.03 TiB	5.80%	32.03 TiB	0.00%
f01981603	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK HONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED	24.72 TiB	4.47%	24.72 TiB	0.00%
f01920091	Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE The Constant Company, LLC	110.50 TiB	20.00%	91.44 TiB	17.25%
f01777786	Ōi, Saitama, JP The Constant Company, LLC	78.03 TiB	14.12%	78.03 TiB	0.00%
f01777787	Paripark, Seoul, KR The Constant Company, LLC	62.44 TiB	11.30%	62.44 TiB	0.00%
f01777785	Singapore, Singapore, SG UCLOUD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED	58.53 TiB	10.59%	58.53 TiB	0.00%
f01777788	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK UNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED	83.28 TiB	15.07%	61.00 TiB	26.75%
f01681234new	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK UNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED	31.25 TiB	5.66%	31.25 TiB	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

• No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

⚠️ 31.63% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
128.84 TiB	128.84 TiB	1	23.32%
22.44 TiB	44.88 TiB	2	8.12%
352.00 GiB	1.03 TiB	3	0.19%
1.81 TiB	7.25 TiB	4	1.31%
35.34 TiB	185.34 TiB	5	33.55%
25.41 TiB	185.16 TiB	6	33.51%

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Approvers
f1gk7n4ckn23ix2bu7q6qtas6eayambn57ass2zfq	Suzhou Qudoufeng Network Technology Co., Ltd.	64.00 GiB	2	11ane-1 1ipfscn 2kernelogic 1liyunzhi-666 1NDLABS-OFFICE 3newwebgroup 2stcouldlisa 3Tom-OriginStorage

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[kernelogic]

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacedakcfl3g4hx3xzw37crzomfzswh5ax355chk5jkjiwwbh5nobkao

Address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

Datacap Allocated

800.00TiB

Signer Address

f1yjhnsoga2ccnepb7t3p3ov5fzom3syhsuinxexa

Id

29b4f45e-8e12-4643-8821-0d76b8f2d04f

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedakcfl3g4hx3xzw37crzomfzswh5ax355chk5jkjiwwbh5nobkao

[LMdesignlab]

Thank you for your efforts @herrehesse

1. We are the Client, and the Client is us. We are the demander for data storage, and currently the company's business data is stored on our servers. We copy the hard drives to SP by mail.

2.LM is a customized architectural design company founded in 2015. It has been in normal operation for 8 years. You can get our information through the above PPT materials. We currently have 400T+ business data, and we want to make 10 replicas, including: Project data design scheme Project design drawing Design rendering Rendering video of renderings Relevant image data after the completion of the project.

3. We apply for DC for the following reasons (1) Our data is valuable to both clients and the construction industry. Future clients are willing to pay to get their data back when they need it. (2) The DC quota allows us to store the data set in Filecoin. When we communicate with SP, they are not willing to provide us with data storage without DC. Because there's a lot of extra cost. These costs are higher than buying our own servers and using a centralized storage service.

4. We reached out to some Filecoin investors, and we also reached out to some technical services teams. We provide the source data, send the hard disk offline, send to the location of SP, and load the data.

5. I'm sorry that we have CID sharing, which is caused by the mistake of technical personnel. You can see that the error is not magnified in subsequent rounds.

[NiwanDao]

It seems that the client ask a third party to prepare the file to the format that Filecoin accepts, and that's the reason for the CID sharing. Please be careful next time.

[NiwanDao]

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzaceakzcw4gwthjf7lbugkqk64r35a5ucel5xsougjj5fhowd3vsg7ui

Address

f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

Datacap Allocated

800.00TiB

Signer Address

f1a2lia2cwwekeubwo4nppt4v4vebxs2frozarz3q

Id

29b4f45e-8e12-4643-8821-0d76b8f2d04f

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceakzcw4gwthjf7lbugkqk64r35a5ucel5xsougjj5fhowd3vsg7ui

[herrehesse]

@LMdesignlab thank you for your detailed explanation, appreciate it.

The business data you provided is very much welcomed to the Filecoin network, but I believe it does not fit the requirements for the Filecoin+ program. The data is purely for and from your business and does not improve the global network as a whole in my opinion.

"The DC quota allows us to store the data set in Filecoin. When we communicate with SP, they are not willing to provide us with data storage without DC. Because there's a lot of extra cost. These costs are higher than buying our own servers and using a centralized storage service."

This one is really important to me, again your transparency is valued, should we grant datacap to applicants who are requesting to store business data at selected storage providers who declined regular paid deals? This way we will never evolve into a monetised storage platform and the datacap will be abused purely for growth only. Not the vision of storing humanities most important information.

[LMdesignlab]

I am happy to discuss with you about the abuse of DC. The following views only represent my own personal views

In my opinion, any data is valuable (except for random computer generated numbers), and each piece of data has a different meaning and function for each person. Whether it's a large public data set or an enterprise data set, if someone is willing to use Fil+ to store it and use it by the rules, I think that's a great thing.

To be honest, Filecoin at this stage is a terrible experience to use, and it will take some time to grow if it is to reach the level of S3.

My personal opinion is: During the Filecoin ➡️ S3 process, Any data loaded into Filecoin is helping Filecoin grow. If there is no DC incentive, SP is hardly motivated to cooperate with Client to store data. This is the fact of the moment. Besides, right now we only have DC.

I think we might as well not put so much value on DC ️ Can we interpret this as a testing phase? Everything is being done to keep Filecoin strong and growing. Whether it's through Fil+, fil-e, or fil-A? Fil-B? OR Fil-?? No matter what data, no matter what form.

Until the use experience of Filecoin can reach S3 or close to S3, we can replace the data. After all, so far, the data storage period is only 540 days.

This is my opinion on DC, which has nothing to do with LM and others.Look forward to your reply😊 @herrehesse

[LMdesignlab]

No slur on Filecoin, just look at it from the perspective of how things are going. This is normal, after all, everyone needs time to grow up.

In the early days, many successful Internet giants gave away their resources to users for free in order to have more users. Users also helped the application/network to further grow while using them. (e.g. Google, wechat, etc.)

So I think Filecoin's DC is a similar reward, This reward is given by the community to Client and SP.

We just need to make sure it's not random computer-generated numbers, it's not an adult video, it's not illegal content. Everyone has the right to enjoy the DC and participate in the community.

What do you think? 🤔

[herrehesse]

@LMdesignlab I agree with you mostly, and I respect the way you are responding to my questions. I wished there where more people like you in this github repo.

"Everyone has the right to enjoy the DC and participate in the community" I 100% agree with you.

It does not automatically mean that "any piece of corporate data may derive the permissions to amass datacap."

Datacap is a gift, not a right.

Aside from my opinion that this data may not be suitable for the Filecoin+ program, I am always in favor of experimenting with customers on the Filecoin network. And I also like the above CID report better than the 9/10 applications I have come across. However, two more questions about the report:

Could you enlighten me if you can still approach storage providers in australia or america for full correct distribution?

Also, data dissemination is still among too few different companies. (And as indicated above regions).

Would love to see improvement in this, in addition to the conversation about the eligibility of the data.

[LMdesignlab]

checker:manualTrigger

[filplus-checker-app[bot]]

DataCap and CID Checker Report[^1]

• Organization: L&M design lab （Shanghai Limu architectural planning and Design Co., Ltd）上海立木建筑规划设计有限公司
• Client: f15cmd7mpswrjpbagpbi233cr3ydauvmi2dbziyla

  Approvers

  11ane-1
  2kernelogic
  1newwebgroup
  2Tom-OriginStorage
  1xingjitansuo
  1YuanHeHK

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

• Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
• Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
• Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
• All storage providers should be located in different regions.

✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.

Provider	Location	Total Deals Sealed	Percentage	Unique Data	Duplicate Deals
f01964215	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN CHINANET-BACKBONE	30.47 TiB	2.11%	30.47 TiB	0.00%
f01924827	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK Diyixian.com Limited	26.69 TiB	1.85%	26.69 TiB	0.00%
f01529999	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK HK Broadband Network Ltd.	70.53 TiB	4.90%	70.53 TiB	0.00%
f01990005new	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK HKBN Enterprise Solutions HK Limited	31.78 TiB	2.21%	31.78 TiB	0.00%
f01771695	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK HONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED	60.50 TiB	4.20%	60.50 TiB	0.00%
f01981603	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK HONG KONG BRIDGE INFO-TECH LIMITED	24.72 TiB	1.72%	24.72 TiB	0.00%
f01920091	Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE The Constant Company, LLC	167.53 TiB	11.63%	148.47 TiB	11.38%
f01777786	Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP The Constant Company, LLC	154.50 TiB	10.72%	154.50 TiB	0.00%
f01777787	Seoul, Seoul, KR The Constant Company, LLC	148.63 TiB	10.32%	148.63 TiB	0.00%
f01777785	Singapore, Singapore, SG UCLOUD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED	152.81 TiB	10.61%	152.81 TiB	0.00%
f01876488	Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VN UCLOUD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED	59.63 TiB	4.14%	59.63 TiB	0.00%
f01953959	Singapore, Singapore, SG UCLOUD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED	16.41 TiB	1.14%	16.41 TiB	0.00%
f01777788	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK UNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED	172.91 TiB	12.00%	150.63 TiB	12.89%
f01681234new	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK UNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED	126.00 TiB	8.75%	126.00 TiB	0.00%
f01732345	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK UNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED	100.84 TiB	7.00%	100.84 TiB	0.00%
f01753456	Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK UNION FU WAH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED	96.78 TiB	6.72%	96.78 TiB	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

• No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size	Total Deals Made	Number of Providers	Deal Percentage
187.91 TiB	187.91 TiB	1	13.04%
41.16 TiB	82.31 TiB	2	5.71%
3.69 TiB	11.06 TiB	3	0.77%
4.31 TiB	17.25 TiB	4	1.20%
4.41 TiB	22.03 TiB	5	1.53%
8.06 TiB	48.38 TiB	6	3.36%
61.31 TiB	438.06 TiB	7	30.41%
75.16 TiB	633.72 TiB	8	43.99%

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client	Application	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs	Approvers
f12k5kukgldua3ag5kzdhi27bxy52cvwf4kn7phfy	BLOCKCHAIN METAVERSE ACADEMY PTY LTD	73.66 TiB	1,890	1kernelogic 1NDLABS-OFFICE 2newwebgroup 1stcouldlisa 1Tom-OriginStorage 1xingjitansuo 1YuanHeHK
f1gk7n4ckn23ix2bu7q6qtas6eayambn57ass2zfq	Suzhou Qudoufeng Network Technology Co., Ltd.	64.00 GiB	2	11ane-1 1ipfscn 2kernelogic 1liyunzhi-666 1NDLABS-OFFICE 3newwebgroup 1stcouldlisa 3Tom-OriginStorage

[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

[LMdesignlab]

I was surprised by CID Checker's results. As for the emerging CID sharing situation, we are investigating the cause. Preliminary judgment is due to the operation error of one of the technical service team, the specific situation is still under investigation. If the violation is true, we will try to have the offending SP terminate the corresponding DC sector.

[herrehesse]

@LMdesignlab Full investigation results are requested by the community as this violation is not acceptable without clear explanation.

[LMdesignlab]

I agree with you. We are also checking. @herrehesse