Closed smcv closed 2 years ago
Would a submodule make more sense, just easier to keep in sync.
Would a submodule make more sense, just easier to keep in sync
I'd rather not have a shared submodule for 2 headers, and I don't think we want to submodule in all of Flatpak just to build flatpak-xdg-utils?
flatpak-spawn is only going to need updates to these headers if they're necessary when giving it new features, and new features need new C code in flatpak-spawn anyway, which seems like a natural time to do the header update. For instance, the last time I updated these enums was in 27f293aa while adding the --share-pids
feature.
This assumes https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/pull/4531 is applied.