search

flav-io / flavio

A Python package for flavour physics phenomenology in the Standard model and beyond
http://flav-io.github.io/
MIT License
71 stars 62 forks source link

Update measurements.yml . #56

Closed jackypheno closed 6 years ago

coveralls commented 6 years ago

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 90.742% when pulling d8e69bf72bba23426bc4fcf770b45a2835fb434b on jackypheno:master into 8d8488ee6f627277940f153ac9a266b3d0a5aa3f on flav-io:master.

DavidMStraub commented 6 years ago

Thanks!

I double-checked it just to be sure. The only case where I'm not sure is tau->muee. PDG has μ-e+e- and μ+e-e-; if I'm not mistaken you used the number for the latter, but the τ→μ process would be the former. Can you please also check again just to be sure?

jackypheno commented 6 years ago

You are right Daivd ! I have corrected the value now. But currently in flavio the notation 'BR(tau->muee)' for the branching ratio of tau- -> mu- e+e- does not specify the lepton charges, I am wondering if at some point one would like to add also the branching ratio of tau- -> mu+e- e-, we need to some how specify the charges.

Thanks.

DavidMStraub commented 6 years ago

Yes, you're right, it's kind of ambiguous. When in doubt, people can look at the description or tex attributes, that are also used to generate the HTML documentation.

The other decay would probe the operators in the sector we called etauemu in WCxf. Not sure if there is a reasonable model generating this, but from on EFT point of view there is no reason not to add it in principle.