Hi, this isn't really an issue, but a call for clarification...
I don't think it's clear what the difference is between getUniProtToIDMapping() and getConvTable(). They clearly give different results, but I don't understand the difference from the manual pages.
I am working with C. elegans, so if I call:
einprot::getUniProtToIDMapping("roundworm")
I get a data.frame mapping UniProt IDs to Gene Names / Symbols.
If I call:
einprot::getConvTable(type = "WormBase")
I get a data.frame mapping UniProt IDs to WormBase IDs. The latter has more mappings.
I need to use both, of course! :-)
Would it make sense to have a function that returned both mappings? Or a single function that could return either mapping? Or if the underlying code is so different, explain that in the help files, and add each function as a "See also" entry in the help file? Would it make sense to unify the argument specifications to each (e.g. "C. elegans" for both)? Just some ideas for clarification!
Hi, this isn't really an issue, but a call for clarification... I don't think it's clear what the difference is between getUniProtToIDMapping() and getConvTable(). They clearly give different results, but I don't understand the difference from the manual pages.
I am working with C. elegans, so if I call:
einprot::getUniProtToIDMapping("roundworm")
I get a data.frame mapping UniProt IDs to Gene Names / Symbols.If I call:
einprot::getConvTable(type = "WormBase")
I get a data.frame mapping UniProt IDs to WormBase IDs. The latter has more mappings.I need to use both, of course! :-)
Would it make sense to have a function that returned both mappings? Or a single function that could return either mapping? Or if the underlying code is so different, explain that in the help files, and add each function as a "See also" entry in the help file? Would it make sense to unify the argument specifications to each (e.g. "C. elegans" for both)? Just some ideas for clarification!