Figure 3 (MAT * MAP interaction)

forc-db / Global_Productivity

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

2 stars 0 forks source link

Figure 3 (MAT * MAP interaction) #46

Closed teixeirak closed 4 years ago

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

from Helene:

[x] add text to each panel on whether relationship is significant.
[x] Helene also asks how the ANPP panel fits with Taylor et al 2017 (for discussion)

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

[x] on y-axis, add label such as "C flux", with units in parentheses
[x] on x-axis, add units (degrees)

beckybanbury commented 4 years ago

Note that now all NPP and ANPP measures are included, the shape of the relationship has changed slightly - potentially relevant for the discussion with Taylor et al.

beckybanbury commented 4 years ago

mat_map_interaction Updated graph

beckybanbury commented 4 years ago

mat_map_interaction

@teixeirak this is the updated graph now I have corrected for how the best model is identified. Its quite a big change in terms of only two models now show a significant interaction effect. I will also produce a table with R2 and P values

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

Thanks, looks good!

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

@beckybanbury, I just noticed that the latest version of this figure is missing x-axis ticks/labels.