Closed teixeirak closed 4 years ago
yes, with the exception of BNPP_fine_root (mat is still better but dAIC<2); output table pasted below for reference
Modnames | AICc | Delta_AICc | Variable |
---|---|---|---|
mod.mat | 126.4262 | 0 | GPP |
mod.growing | 140.8059 | 14.37972 | GPP |
mod | 178.9618 | 52.53562 | GPP |
mod.mat | 174.8825 | 0 | NPP |
mod.growing | 191.5371 | 16.65465 | NPP |
mod | 216.1698 | 41.28727 | NPP |
mod.mat | 249.5051 | 0 | BNPP_root |
mod.growing | 254.2076 | 4.702509 | BNPP_root |
mod | 268.9401 | 19.43497 | BNPP_root |
mod.mat | 235.958 | 0 | BNPP_root_fine |
mod.growing | 237.2899 | 1.331942 | BNPP_root_fine |
mod | 243.137 | 7.179027 | BNPP_root_fine |
mod.mat | 484.8761 | 0 | ANPP |
mod.growing | 520.9648 | 36.08872 | ANPP |
mod | 560.3491 | 75.47305 | ANPP |
mod.mat | 184.5448 | 0 | ANPP_foliage |
mod.growing | 204.9269 | 20.38205 | ANPP_foliage |
mod | 237.4655 | 52.92074 | ANPP_foliage |
mod.mat | 540.1922 | 0 | ANPP_woody_stem |
mod.growing | 566.3696 | 26.17739 | ANPP_woody_stem |
mod | 578.6553 | 38.46312 | ANPP_woody_stem |
mod.mat | 45.25818 | 0 | R_auto |
mod.growing | 50.35515 | 5.096973 | R_auto |
mod | 56.16877 | 10.9106 | R_auto |
mod.mat | 133.535 | 0 | R_auto_root |
mod.growing | 135.9263 | 2.391311 | R_auto_root |
mod | 141.7872 | 8.25219 | R_auto_root |
Thanks! I updated Table 1 accordingly. Let's reformat this as an SI table.
@beckybanbury, Table 1 indicates a consistent "no" answer for this hypothesis across fluxes. Can we say that it's statistically significant (dAIC>2) in all cases?