search

forc-db / Global_Productivity

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
2 stars 0 forks source link

H4.4. Growing season length is a better predictor of FACF than MAT #58

Closed teixeirak closed 4 years ago

teixeirak commented 4 years ago

@beckybanbury, Table 1 indicates a consistent "no" answer for this hypothesis across fluxes. Can we say that it's statistically significant (dAIC>2) in all cases?

beckybanbury commented 4 years ago

yes, with the exception of BNPP_fine_root (mat is still better but dAIC<2); output table pasted below for reference

Modnames AICc Delta_AICc Variable
mod.mat 126.4262 0 GPP
mod.growing 140.8059 14.37972 GPP
mod 178.9618 52.53562 GPP
mod.mat 174.8825 0 NPP
mod.growing 191.5371 16.65465 NPP
mod 216.1698 41.28727 NPP
mod.mat 249.5051 0 BNPP_root
mod.growing 254.2076 4.702509 BNPP_root
mod 268.9401 19.43497 BNPP_root
mod.mat 235.958 0 BNPP_root_fine
mod.growing 237.2899 1.331942 BNPP_root_fine
mod 243.137 7.179027 BNPP_root_fine
mod.mat 484.8761 0 ANPP
mod.growing 520.9648 36.08872 ANPP
mod 560.3491 75.47305 ANPP
mod.mat 184.5448 0 ANPP_foliage
mod.growing 204.9269 20.38205 ANPP_foliage
mod 237.4655 52.92074 ANPP_foliage
mod.mat 540.1922 0 ANPP_woody_stem
mod.growing 566.3696 26.17739 ANPP_woody_stem
mod 578.6553 38.46312 ANPP_woody_stem
mod.mat 45.25818 0 R_auto
mod.growing 50.35515 5.096973 R_auto
mod 56.16877 10.9106 R_auto
mod.mat 133.535 0 R_auto_root
mod.growing 135.9263 2.391311 R_auto_root
mod 141.7872 8.25219 R_auto_root
teixeirak commented 4 years ago

Thanks! I updated Table 1 accordingly. Let's reformat this as an SI table.