More cases:
New case_name 'Hamid v. Garland' looks too different from old 'Terry Wike v. State Bar of Nevada'. Court ca9. Docket 69124062
New case_name 'United States v. Thomas' looks too different from old 'Marvin Miller and Covina Publishing, Inc., a Corporation Doing Business as Collector's Publication v. United States'. Court ca9. Docket 2363426
Seems like we are missing something about
ca9
docket numbers, since the same number sometimes leads to different cases in these pairs:Example docket:
The oral argument with case name "In re: NEWMAN" has docket number 21-1228
The opinion with case name "Edgar G. C. v. Garland" has the same docket number
Docket. Unpublished
ca9
opinion for case "USA V. CARDOZA" has the same docket number "23-1071" as oral argument for case "In re: Shayman"Docket with docket number 23-1111, court ca9
RECAP Example
From one of the documents:
Opinion with the same docket number
More cases:
New case_name 'Hamid v. Garland' looks too different from old 'Terry Wike v. State Bar of Nevada'. Court ca9. Docket 69124062
New case_name 'United States v. Thomas' looks too different from old 'Marvin Miller and Covina Publishing, Inc., a Corporation Doing Business as Collector's Publication v. United States'. Court ca9. Docket 2363426
Related to https://github.com/freelawproject/courtlistener/issues/4256