I am the developer / maintainer for the Linux OneDrive client and the above issue has been raised by a user, who is having an issue - however I am at present unable to replicate not only the issue, but operating environment as well.
The key to understanding the issue / problem is in the debug log files.
In the logs, we have a variable (idToQuery) set to a particular item. that variable is then used, twice, for 2 different queries, with zero variable modification. For the first query, this works without issue, for the second, this variable has been 'munged' & contains bad data - this the query that utilises this query fails.
We have tried using 2 different compilers (DMD / LDC) and the issue remains the same - in the same spot.
This issue is 100% reproducible on the users environment, but, on Arch Linux (or any other Linux platform that is non JuNest) there is zero issue - unable to reproduce at all.
It would be great to get some insight / ideas from the JuNest community on this issue. Does JuNest use any sort of aggressive in-memory deduplication or anything along those lines?
Hi all,
I was wondering if the JuNest folk can provide some insight / analysis on the following issue - https://github.com/abraunegg/onedrive/issues/1086
I am the developer / maintainer for the Linux OneDrive client and the above issue has been raised by a user, who is having an issue - however I am at present unable to replicate not only the issue, but operating environment as well.
The key to understanding the issue / problem is in the debug log files.
In the logs, we have a variable (idToQuery) set to a particular item. that variable is then used, twice, for 2 different queries, with zero variable modification. For the first query, this works without issue, for the second, this variable has been 'munged' & contains bad data - this the query that utilises this query fails.
We have tried using 2 different compilers (DMD / LDC) and the issue remains the same - in the same spot.
This issue is 100% reproducible on the users environment, but, on Arch Linux (or any other Linux platform that is non JuNest) there is zero issue - unable to reproduce at all.
It would be great to get some insight / ideas from the JuNest community on this issue. Does JuNest use any sort of aggressive in-memory deduplication or anything along those lines?