Closed ftyers closed 10 months ago
Cross check annotation of ordinal structure.
Questions:
Re: in yehhuantin mexica (Andrews, p.420)
Re: in yehhuantin mexica (Andrews, p.420)
the appos
analysis in the original is :+1:
WDYT?
I think in this case we should have conj
from tetzahuitl to quitetzammatia, since they both could be clausal subjects of motenehua. This is different from the case of parataxis:shared
we have previously discussed, since here both clauses act as subject to the same verb (vs. to clauses that share an argument).
for posterity:
Is catca a copula? (see also https://github.com/ftyers/UD_Classical_Nahuatl-FloCo/issues/5)
Yes
What is the structure of in yehhuantin mexicah ?
det(in, yehhuantin)
appos(yehhuantin, mexica)
What is the structure of motenehua in tetzahuitl catca
in tetzahuitl catca is clausal subject of motenehua
We have three ins, what are their functions, what is their structure?:
mark
)mark
)det
)