Open dreistein543 opened 1 year ago
I fixed the first of your points. See commit https://github.com/gaksaray/AOM-LaTeX-template/commit/f075f27d35b6c7c7ecd77d04e9c773803dafc3d0.
As far as I can tell from the style guide, two-author citations are separated with and
as in Van Dorn and Xavier (2001)
and three- or more-author citations are separated with &
. Anyway, I don't know how to write citation style bst
files so I inherited the aomlike.bst
from another repo. I am leaving this issue open in case anyone wants to tackle the more complex needs of AOM citations.
I think the &/and
issue is not very important, but the first citation with full name list needs to be fixed (i.e. aomlike.bst
needs to support the longnamesfirst
option of natbib
). sadly, I have googled but have not found any simple way to adjust aomlike.bst
so that the longnamesfirst
option works
according to author guide:
citation in text with pages should display as (author, year: pages) like (Lee, 1998: 3) while current template produce (Lee, 1988, 3) with
\citep[3]{lee1998}
(or maybe I should use another command to cite with pages?)besides, article with only 2 authors should be separated with
&
(like most AOM journal (eg. AMJ or AMR)) while current version useand
. (but the year only citation usesand
likeLee and Xavier (1998)
, this makes me confused.)as to article with 3 or more authors, the first citation should list all of them and abbreviate with
et al
at subsequent citation. current template useset al
for all citations.