It's OK as-is, but if you have time, this would be my feedback: currently it's very generic, doesn't give much info.
You could mention some concrete plans (see https://github.com/gammapy/gamma-sky/issues), like implementing "map share URL" or adding Google analytics so that we know if / how the page is being used, or adding the Fermi high-energy images.
Concerning status, I'd suggest to not say anything. Let's just try to get a solid version together (Angular 2.0, gamma-cat as TeV, some more info and spectra / lightcurves for Fermi, Google analytics) and then "launch 1.0" it soon. Describing status more precisely now in the proceeding or trying to give a date for "launch 1.0" isn't useful.
vorugantia
commented
8 years ago
It's OK as-is, but if you have time, this would be my feedback: currently it's very generic, doesn't give much info.
You could mention some concrete plans (see https://github.com/gammapy/gamma-sky/issues), like implementing "map share URL" or adding Google analytics so that we know if / how the page is being used, or adding the Fermi high-energy images.
Concerning status, I'd suggest to not say anything. Let's just try to get a solid version together (Angular 2.0, gamma-cat as TeV, some more info and spectra / lightcurves for Fermi, Google analytics) and then "launch 1.0" it soon. Describing status more precisely now in the proceeding or trying to give a date for "launch 1.0" isn't useful.