geneontology / go-annotation

This repository hosts the tracker for issues pertaining to GO annotations.
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
35 stars 10 forks source link

PANTHER:PTN002007691 #4617

Closed ValWood closed 1 year ago

ValWood commented 1 year ago

UniProtKB:Q9UH36 | SRRD | involved_in | GO:0007017    microtubule-based process | ECO:0000318   IBA | PMID:21873635 | PANTHER:PTN002007691 more... | 9606 Homo sapiens | GO_Central

Inference is from a single paper, and is really a phenotype

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00294-007-0169-3

This is the summary from the manuscript

Synthetic lethal screen analyses revealed that Rpn4, Ard1, Nat1 and Ber1 share a wide set of genetic interactions (Fig. 2). Our data therefore suggest that Ber1 may function in protein N-terminus acetylation and/or proteasome biogenesis. Since proteasome subunits are heavily N-acetylated (Csank et al. 2002), the role of Ber1 in proteasome assembly might be a secondary consequence of its role in protein modification. Thus, we suggest that Ber1 might be an accessory factor for the N-terminal acetyltransferase. We would however like to point out that with the currently available data this is only a working hypothesis.

The authors don't mention "microtubule based process" specifically, this is a phenotype from benomyl resistance.

Erorneous annotation (phenotype)

Note that in mice this highly conserved gene is annotated to heme biosynthesis and a new pombe paper implicates it in "isochore formation at the centromere"

Fission yeast Srr1 and Skb1 promote isochromosome formation at the centromere PMID: 37237082 (I probably worn make a GO process from this paper)

So whatever it is, it has pleiotropic effects

marcfeuermann commented 1 year ago

Indeed. Annotation removed.