Open pvgenuchten opened 2 months ago
When importing
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020175"> <dc:identifier>10.1002/eqe.3286</dc:identifier> <dct:references>http://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3286</dct:references> <dc:type>document</dc:type> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
vs
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020175"> <dc:identifier>10.1002/2016WR020175</dc:identifier> <dct:references rdf:resource="http://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020175"/> <dc:type>document</dc:type> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
the first works fine, the second returns an empty reference element, can we support both the second may be the optimal choice considering https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/terms/references/
When importing
vs
the first works fine, the second returns an empty reference element, can we support both the second may be the optimal choice considering https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/terms/references/