Closed cabo closed 2 years ago
Thanks!
Yes, this will not impact any code or the output, so :+1:
As for semantics: Would it be better to call it item_label
and assign it to all items? Then the list label can be determined by looking at the first item label.
I specifically need the first label of the list (so I put it on the list).
But putting a label on each item would only insignificantly increase the amount of code needed.
Hmm... okay, then we will only use the first one and if need be add the change for the others.
One thing to change, though: Could you name it :first_list_marker
? In the syntax documentation it is always called "list marker" and since it is the first one and not something else, it should also have "first" somewhere in its name.
I pushed an update with :first_list_marker
.
Thanks for the changes - I will do a release for this in the near future.
Thanks - I have cherry-picked the commit!
Making the initial list label available to the processor enables implementing behaviors such as deriving a starting number from the initial label. (This should not impact any existing code.)