Closed KatjaSchulz closed 2 years ago
Names with seemingly innocuous epithets that nevertheless end up in an unparsed tail:
Profusulinella оblопgа Potievskaya, 1964
Tetrataxis toгosus Postoyalko, 1975
Anomalina badkhyseпsis Kuryleva, 1973
Bigenerina iпfrapaleogenica Suleymanov, 1963
Carpelimus (Trogophloeus) rougemoпti Gildenkov, 2014
All of these contain cyrillic characters that not suppose to be in scientific names: п
, г
, so they are not parsed correctly
I bet whoever entered them was in the middle of replying to their instant message :D
Selenops ab Logunov & Jäger, 2015
Ruteloryctes bis Dechambre, 2006
Antaplaga dela Druce, 1904
Baeolidia dela (Er. Marcus & Ev. Marcus, 1960)
Dicentria dela Druce, 1894
Epeloria dela Chamberlin, 1946
Eulaira dela Chamberlin & Ivie, 1933
Paralvinella dela Detinova, 1988
Scoparia dela Clarke, 1965
Tortolena dela Chamberlin & Ivie, 1941
Semiothisa da Dyar, 1916
Gnathopleustes den (J.L. Barnard, 1969)
Agnetina den Cao, T.K.T. & Bae, 2006
Desmoxytes des Srisonchai, Enghoff & Panha, 2016
Meteorus dos Zitani, 1998
Stenoecia dos Freyer, 1838
Sympycnus du Curran, 1929
Bolitoglossa la Campbell, Smith, Streicher, Acevedo & Brodie, 2010
Leptonetela la Wang & Li, 2017
Nocaracris van Ünal, 2016
Zodarion van Bosmans, 2009
Malamatidia zu Jäger & Dankittipakul, 2010
these are tricky, I have to think what to do
One more:
Campylosphaera dela (M.N.Bramlette & F.R.Sullivan) W.W.Hay & H.Mohler
ambiguous names should be parsed now without conswquences for other names (hopefully). The solution is a bit hackish, but should work
Is chûjôi a "strange" valid epithet? I don't think accents are accepted in Latin/latinized names/epithets at all. The others mentioned above to be "strange", like non-scripta, I guess they are "strange" but valid.
Seleuca chûjôi Voss, 1957
These are all accepted species names from COL2021-07-29. I don't think any of them are database artifacts.
Here's another one for the "nudum" whitelist:
Microsiphum nudum
Names with short epithets that are interpreted as part of the author data:
Selenops ab Logunov & Jäger, 2015 Ruteloryctes bis Dechambre, 2006 Antaplaga dela Druce, 1904 Baeolidia dela (Er. Marcus & Ev. Marcus, 1960) Dicentria dela Druce, 1894 Epeloria dela Chamberlin, 1946 Eulaira dela Chamberlin & Ivie, 1933 Paralvinella dela Detinova, 1988 Scoparia dela Clarke, 1965 Tortolena dela Chamberlin & Ivie, 1941 Semiothisa da Dyar, 1916 Gnathopleustes den (J.L. Barnard, 1969) Agnetina den Cao, T.K.T. & Bae, 2006 Desmoxytes des Srisonchai, Enghoff & Panha, 2016 Meteorus dos Zitani, 1998 Stenoecia dos Freyer, 1838 Sympycnus du Curran, 1929 Bolitoglossa la Campbell, Smith, Streicher, Acevedo & Brodie, 2010 Leptonetela la Wang & Li, 2017 Nocaracris van Ünal, 2016 Zodarion van Bosmans, 2009 Malamatidia zu Jäger & Dankittipakul, 2010
Names with ser/subser epithets that are interpreted as rank information or end up in an unparsed tail:
Helophorus (Lihelophorus) ser Zaitzev, 1908 Serina ser Gredler, 1898 Serina subser Gredler, 1898
Names with strange epithets that end up in an unparsed tail:
Seleuca chûjôi Voss, 1957 Peperomia non-alata Trel. Hyacinthoides non-scripta (L.) Chouard ex Rothm. Monocelis non-scripta Curini-Galletti, 2014 Macromitrium st.-johnii E. B. Bartram, 1940
Names with seemingly innocuous epithets that nevertheless end up in an unparsed tail:
Profusulinella оblопgа Potievskaya, 1964 Tetrataxis toгosus Postoyalko, 1975 Anomalina badkhyseпsis Kuryleva, 1973 Bigenerina iпfrapaleogenica Suleymanov, 1963 Carpelimus (Trogophloeus) rougemoпti Gildenkov, 2014