search

gnecula / bond

Spy-based testing library.
http://necula01.github.io/bond/
Other
7 stars 3 forks source link

Licensing? #20

Closed xkrogen closed 8 years ago

xkrogen commented 8 years ago

Is there a license you usually use for open source / one we're supposed to use because of Berkeley? Started thinking about this because RubyGems is mildly unhappy if you don't specify a license.

gnecula commented 8 years ago

We do need a license. I would prefer BSD license.

George.

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Erik notifications@github.com wrote:

Is there a license you usually use for open source / one we're supposed to use because of Berkeley? Started thinking about this because RubyGems is mildly unhappy if you don't specify a license.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/necula01/bond/issues/20.

xkrogen commented 8 years ago

Do you have between 3-clause and 2-clause?

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 1:32 AM, George Necula notifications@github.com wrote:

We do need a license. I would prefer BSD license.

George.

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Erik notifications@github.com wrote:

Is there a license you usually use for open source / one we're supposed to use because of Berkeley? Started thinking about this because RubyGems is mildly unhappy if you don't specify a license.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/necula01/bond/issues/20.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/necula01/bond/issues/20#issuecomment-151413572.

xkrogen commented 8 years ago

Also for the portion of the license, would that be us? UC Berkeley? Not very familiar with this sort of thing...

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Erik Krogen erikkrogen@gmail.com wrote:

Do you have between 3-clause and 2-clause?

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 1:32 AM, George Necula notifications@github.com wrote:

We do need a license. I would prefer BSD license.

George.

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Erik notifications@github.com wrote:

Is there a license you usually use for open source / one we're supposed to use because of Berkeley? Started thinking about this because RubyGems is mildly unhappy if you don't specify a license.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/necula01/bond/issues/20.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/necula01/bond/issues/20#issuecomment-151413572.

gnecula commented 8 years ago

Neither am I. I did not know there is an owner. I know that UCB want to be explicitly released of any liability.

George.

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Erik notifications@github.com wrote:

Also for the portion of the license, would that be us? UC Berkeley? Not very familiar with this sort of thing...

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Erik Krogen erikkrogen@gmail.com wrote:

Do you have between 3-clause and 2-clause?

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 1:32 AM, George Necula <notifications@github.com

wrote:

We do need a license. I would prefer BSD license.

George.

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Erik notifications@github.com wrote:

Is there a license you usually use for open source / one we're supposed to use because of Berkeley? Started thinking about this because RubyGems is mildly unhappy if you don't specify a license.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/necula01/bond/issues/20.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/necula01/bond/issues/20#issuecomment-151413572.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/necula01/bond/issues/20#issuecomment-151415378.