I've been a go-check user for 4 years or so now. I love this software, but it's frustrating to see so many forks with so many competing, similar features. It's incredibly hard to see 24 open pull requests, with literally all the ones that have hit CI marked passed (which is almost half of them), with zero comments or interaction at all. Some of them are years old I think.
It'd be really nice if someone would take up the maintainership duties here since they don't seem to be happening. I'm putting my hat in here, in a lame attempt to improve the things I think need improving.
It doesn't have to be me, and of course, it doesn't have to change maintainers if that's not what people want. It doesn't even have to be exceptionally hasty on the release end, but it would be extremely nice if there was at least some indication that maintenance is happening.
This code still has a lot of things that could be fixed or improved in fundamental, non-featureful ways -- and a lot of the PRs address them, so it'd really be nice to get better feedback than "it's mature" in response.
I hope my request is not seen as hostile, but more a request to find someone or some way to get this software back on the right track. Everyone gets busy. I get it.
I've been a go-check user for 4 years or so now. I love this software, but it's frustrating to see so many forks with so many competing, similar features. It's incredibly hard to see 24 open pull requests, with literally all the ones that have hit CI marked passed (which is almost half of them), with zero comments or interaction at all. Some of them are years old I think.
It'd be really nice if someone would take up the maintainership duties here since they don't seem to be happening. I'm putting my hat in here, in a lame attempt to improve the things I think need improving.
It doesn't have to be me, and of course, it doesn't have to change maintainers if that's not what people want. It doesn't even have to be exceptionally hasty on the release end, but it would be extremely nice if there was at least some indication that maintenance is happening.
This code still has a lot of things that could be fixed or improved in fundamental, non-featureful ways -- and a lot of the PRs address them, so it'd really be nice to get better feedback than "it's mature" in response.
I hope my request is not seen as hostile, but more a request to find someone or some way to get this software back on the right track. Everyone gets busy. I get it.
Thanks.