codecov-commenter
commented
1 month ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 69.63%. Comparing base (
ee731d0) to head (dfbcd8f).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #317 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 69.63% 69.63% Complexity 335 335 ========================================= Files 25 25 Lines 1324 1324 Branches 214 214 ========================================= Hits 922 922 Misses 316 316 Partials 86 86 ```:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
bashir2
Description of what I changed
Automatically created by running:
E2E test
TESTED:
Please replace this with a description of how you tested your PR beyond the automated e2e/unit tests.
Checklist: I completed these to help reviewers :)
[x] I have read and will follow the review process.
[x] I am familiar with Google Style Guides for the language I have coded in.
No? Please take some time and review Java and Python style guides.
[x] My IDE is configured to follow the Google code styles.
No? Unsure? -> configure your IDE.
[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes. (If you refactored existing code that was well tested you do not have to add tests)
[x] I ran
mvn clean packageright before creating this pull request and added all formatting changes to my commit.[x] All new and existing tests passed.
[x] My pull request is based on the latest changes of the master branch.
No? Unsure? -> execute command
git pull --rebase upstream master