Open kostjerry opened 1 year ago
Wouldn't it be possible to catch this case with a relatively straightforward validation script or rule in the GTFS Validator?
You're totally right from the perspective of the GTFS consumer. Nevertheless this approach could decrease data maintenance efforts for data producers.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It may be closed manually after one month of inactivity. Thank you for your contributions.
It would be convenient to have possibility to bundle-fill the area.
Motivation: in Athens there are
airport
area andurban
area. Theairport
area can be simply modeled by adding stops to thestop_areas.txt
. Theurban
area contains all other stops of the city and there's a lot of such. Therefore if a provider adds some stops to the stops.txt in theurban
zone he could miss to add them to thestop_areas.txt
and it will fall to an issue.I’m proposing to add new file
area_networks.txt
as many-to-many relation betweennetwork_id
andarea_id
. This means that all stops of the routes marked bynetwork_id
will belong to thearea_id
.Additionally I’m proposing to extend
stop_areas.txt
bytype
(with possible valuesinclude
orexclude
) which will defaults toinclude
.