Open ittorchbearer opened 2 years ago
I'll go through and change it around a bit. I leaned too heavily on minimal change over correctness.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022, 7:43 PM Ben Boeckel @.***> wrote:
@.**** commented on this pull request.
In src/common.rs https://github.com/graphql-rust/graphql-parser/pull/65#discussion_r861384213 :
impl Number {
[cfg(not(feature = "as_i32"))]
Feature flags should be additive. We can still provide as_i64 even with an i32 because that has an impl Into.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/graphql-rust/graphql-parser/pull/65#pullrequestreview-957146193, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQTIR7TEHJNXGMZTK6UDX6TVHMPA3ANCNFSM5UTSF2HQ . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
FWIW, a CI job that runs with the feature flag would also likely be appreciated.
@ittorchbearer or @mathstuf, any update on this?
Waiting on updates from the author AFAIK.
(@ittorchbearer FYI)
added as_i32 backward-compatible feature flag to allow running to GraphQL spec here: https://graphql.org/learn/schema/#scalar-types