Open lbssousa opened 2 years ago
Off the cuff, it seems like a bug. Can you share this particular gabc file?
Sure:
name: Ad te, Domine;
mode: 4;
mode-differentia: c;
commentary: Cantus ID 001255 cf. Sl 143(142),8d-9;
book: Graduale Simplex, 1975, p. 53;
nabc-lines: 1;
%%
(c3)
Ad<alt>\textcolor{gregoriocolor}{Cantor}</alt>(f|ta) te,(h|vi) Dó(hi|pe)mi(i|vi)ne,(i|vi) *(,)
le<alt>\textcolor{gregoriocolor}{Omnes}</alt>(i|vi)vá(i|vi)vi(h|ta) á(ij|pe)ni(h|ta)mam(ij|pe>) me(i|ta)am:(i|ta) (;)
ve(f|talsi7)ni,(i|vi) et(h|vi) é(g|vi)ri(f|vi)pe(e|ta) me,(fe|cl-) (,)
Dó(d|ta)mi(e|vi)ne,(f|vi) ad(gxg|////vi) te(h|vi) con(gxg|////vi)fú(f|ta)gi.(f|ta)
(::)
(i+)
Thanks.
It looks like NABC co-opts the above lines text feature, so the way it is right now you can't have abovelinestext and NABC at the same time. This is not a bug per se, but it's probably a good enhancement.
This is probably the root cause of #1547 too.
I have some antiphons like this in my document:![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1277917/151833800-7ea573a5-bc58-4cf1-80fd-4c3a154fe456.png)
I've tried to include some adiastematic neums to this score, but when I include the NABC code, the Above-Lines-Text dissapears:![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1277917/151834172-d25414e3-19ab-409e-9d7e-5c55d268ea7e.png)
Is this expected? Can I have both Above-Lines-Text and NABC neums in the same staff?