search

guibranco / projects-monitor

⚙️🔔 GitHub projects monitor
https://guilherme.straccini.com/projects-monitor/
MIT License
3 stars 0 forks source link

Update appveyor.php #657

Closed guibranco closed 1 week ago

guibranco commented 1 week ago

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

ℹ Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 week ago

[!CAUTION]

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce a new dependency in the appveyor.php file by adding a require_once statement for session_validator.php. This addition incorporates session validation functionality into the application. The session_validator.php file contains logic for validating user sessions, including checks for session status, expiration, and error response handling, along with various security enhancements.

Changes

File Change Summary
Src/api/v1/appveyor.php - Added require_once for session_validator.php.
Src/api/v1/session_validator.php - Introduced session validation logic, including session checks, error response handling, and security settings for sessions. Functions sendErrorResponse and validateIP added. Constants SESSION_TIMEOUT and MAX_REQUESTS_PER_MINUTE defined.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement, Review effort [1-5]: 2

Suggested reviewers

🐇 In the code we hop and play,
With sessions safe, we guard the way.
Timeout checks and cookies tight,
Keep our users safe, day and night.
Security's a joyful dance,
In our code, we take a chance! 🛡️

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 10 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue? After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.
🚦 How do rate limits work? CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/faq) for further information.
📥 Commits Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between debb5a792d3e406a0d7f66ea29e05b148ae23719 and 81126e8c9061cbdbc48312a709a808ff6c48eb91.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
🪧 Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
guibranco commented 1 week ago

@gstraccini codacy bypass

gstraccini[bot] commented 1 week ago

Bypassing the Codacy analysis for this pull request! :warning:

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 week ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

2:11AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
2:11AM INF 675 commits scanned.
2:11AM INF scan completed in 285ms
2:11AM INF no leaks found
github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

:rocket: Postman tests are disabled

:x: The Postman collection run is disabled.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

:test_tube: Request tests summary

:white_check_mark: All test requests succeeded

github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

:mag: Database integrity summary

:white_check_mark: The database integrity check succeeded

github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

:fire_engine: Smoke tests summary

:fire: Smoke tests passed!