guibranco / projects-monitor

βš™οΈπŸ”” GitHub projects monitor
https://guilherme.straccini.com/projects-monitor/
MIT License
3 stars 0 forks source link

Update session_validator.php #679

Closed guibranco closed 1 week ago

guibranco commented 1 week ago

Closes #

πŸ“‘ Description

βœ… Checks

☒️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

β„Ή Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 week ago

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve the addition of a single line in session_validator.php to call session_write_close() at the end of the script. This modification ensures that session data is properly finalized and made available for subsequent requests, enhancing concurrency and performance. The existing logic for session management, error handling, and rate limiting remains unchanged, preserving the overall control flow and functionality of the session validation process.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
Src/api/v1/session_validator.php Added a call to session_write_close() at the end of the script.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

β˜‘οΈ auto-merge, size/XS

Suggested reviewers

πŸ‡ In the code where sessions play,
A close command we now convey.
With data saved, it’s clear to see,
Concurrency blooms, oh what glee!
So hop along, let’s validate,
In perfect sync, we celebrate! πŸŽ‰


πŸ“œ Recent review details **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**
πŸ“₯ Commits Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c809207c2ca484434400421728c3fddf82f82267 and 47c0eabd2f1df433b2a5b2af22b160084b52955b.
πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1) * `Src/api/v1/session_validator.php` (1 hunks)
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (2)
Src/api/v1/session_validator.php (2) `88-88`: **LGTM! Good performance optimization.** Adding `session_write_close()` is a good practice as it releases the session lock immediately after all operations are complete, allowing better concurrent request handling from the same user. Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose: ```diff +// Release session lock early to allow concurrent requests session_write_close(); ``` Let's verify no session writes occur after this call:
βœ… Verification successful **No session writes detected after session_write_close()** The verification confirms that there are no session operations after the `session_write_close()` call, making this a safe and effective performance optimization.
🏁 Scripts executed The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential session writes after session_write_close() # Look for $_SESSION assignments or session_* function calls after session_write_close rg -A 5 "session_write_close\(\)" | rg -A 5 "\$_SESSION|\bsession_" ``` Length of output: 124
--- Line range hint `1-88`: **Verify session management approach for distributed environments.** While the session management implementation is solid for single-server setups, consider reviewing these aspects if deploying in a distributed environment: 1. Session storage mechanism (file-based sessions might not be suitable) 2. Load balancer session affinity requirements 3. Shared session storage solutions if needed Let's check if this is part of a distributed system:

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
πŸͺ§ Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 week ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

11:23PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
11:23PM INF 649 commits scanned.
11:23PM INF scan completed in 283ms
11:23PM INF no leaks found
github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

:rocket: Postman tests are disabled

:x: The Postman collection run is disabled.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

:test_tube: Request tests summary

:white_check_mark: All test requests succeeded

github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

:mag: Database integrity summary

:white_check_mark: The database integrity check succeeded

github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

:fire_engine: Smoke tests summary

:fire: Smoke tests passed!

guibranco commented 1 week ago

@gstraccini codacy reanalyze commit

gstraccini[bot] commented 1 week ago

Reanalyzing the commit 47c0eabd2f1df433b2a5b2af22b160084b52955b in Codacy! :warning: