The logical thing is to have the subitem and sub-sub-item counter reset on each new parent. In the example above the third level enumeration for A2 starts at i, then ii, etc.
But the extension currently uses a single enumeration for every level, that crosses the parent items such that the orders are as follows:
Item A
Subitem A1
Item A1i
Item A1ii
SubItem A2
Item A2iii
Item A2iv
Item B
SubItem B3
SubItem B4
Item B4v
Item C
The ordering (for the purpose of the numbered shortcuts) should have been like in the first example. Having the ordering as it is in the second example means numbered shortcuts breaks if you have more than 10 items across any menu level, because you have &11, &12, &13, etc. all having the same shortcut character (number 1).
I'm not filing this issue under [Feature Request] as I consider the current behavior a bug, one that people have learned to live with. It would break muscle memory if this get fixed but it'd be way more functional.
Suppose I have this menu layout:
The logical thing is to have the subitem and sub-sub-item counter reset on each new parent. In the example above the third level enumeration for A2 starts at i, then ii, etc.
But the extension currently uses a single enumeration for every level, that crosses the parent items such that the orders are as follows:
The ordering (for the purpose of the numbered shortcuts) should have been like in the first example. Having the ordering as it is in the second example means numbered shortcuts breaks if you have more than 10 items across any menu level, because you have &11, &12, &13, etc. all having the same shortcut character (number 1).
I'm not filing this issue under [Feature Request] as I consider the current behavior a bug, one that people have learned to live with. It would break muscle memory if this get fixed but it'd be way more functional.