Open UnlimitedCookies opened 1 week ago
We have (undocumented) cabal man
.
It'd be nice to have, I agree. The downside is we already have a big issue with our reference manual and cabal --help
duplicating each other and wildly diverging at times, with some info available in one but not in the other.
cabal man
had little maintenance over the recent years, I think, so I'd expect it to be even more badly outdated. I wish someone worked on making our help pages uniform and produced from a single source of truth. Even providing examples of setups that achieve that would be helpful.
I noticed you can't say cabal man build
or such, which would be desirable too.
It'd be nice to have, I agree. The downside is we already have a big issue with our reference manual and cabal --help duplicating each other and wildly diverging at times, with some info available in one but not in the other.
Perhaps they could be consolidated into one or few sources of information that then get populated into the various sources. The git manpages are a good example for how to do it right, but it seems like they spent quite a lot of effort on that.
Generally I expect a binary like
/usr/bin/cabal
to be accompanied by a helpful manpage. This should include available flags/subcommands and perhaps a few examples.