I had added text about the sftp subsystem, whose subsystem name has not been registered with IANA, since the draft was abandoned in 2007.
Thorsten warns that trying to document anomalies is impossible. Can we be sure that this is the only one?
I would say, no. It is the only one that I know of which is widely used.
Thorsten also warns that it is likely not worth the effort to register it.
So, embracing the wisdom of Thorsten and realizing that the draft explicitly states that unregistered but syntactically correct names MUST NOT generate an error. That allows the most likely name, 'sftp', to be passed. Maybe we need do nothing further and should just remove that text about sftp altogether?
I had added text about the sftp subsystem, whose subsystem name has not been registered with IANA, since the draft was abandoned in 2007.
Thorsten warns that trying to document anomalies is impossible. Can we be sure that this is the only one?
I would say, no. It is the only one that I know of which is widely used.
Thorsten also warns that it is likely not worth the effort to register it.
So, embracing the wisdom of Thorsten and realizing that the draft explicitly states that unregistered but syntactically correct names MUST NOT generate an error. That allows the most likely name, 'sftp', to be passed. Maybe we need do nothing further and should just remove that text about sftp altogether?