alessiamarcolini
commented
9 months ago Hey @NeurogliaNerd,
the random coordinates calculation is performed here: https://github.com/histolab/histolab/blob/52bb10be6717fd821981147cc29adfa212254f46/histolab/tiler.py#L741-L781
where
- we sample a pair of random coordinates for the upper left corner of the tile from the binary extraction mask (which is calculated on the slide thumbnail),
- then we scale the tile dimensions to the dimension of the binary extraction mask
- Then we calculate the top left and bottom right coordinates at the requested level of extraction (which in your case is level 0).
- Last step is to scale those coordinates to level 0 coordinates (which they already are in your case)
All of this is to avoid sampling over huge binary masks. Now, there could be some rounding errors, but I doubt it was SO off.
in this particular example measures 1767 pixels wide by 1519 pixels high
Did you check with slide.dimensions?
If so, could you share a code snippet and the image you used so we can figure it out?
Hello @alessiamarcolini @Christopher22 ,
From my understanding, when I apply the RandomTiler in Histolab, I get a tile with coordinate information for the bottom left and top right vertices in the file name PVALB054seed16777216tile_1_level0_1980-700-2280-900 ( I added in the other information that is not bolded). However, I'd like to know how these coordinates are calculated, because the image I'm using in this particular example measures 1767 pixels wide by 1519 pixels high. How is Histolab arriving at the numbers it is exporting? I'd appreciate any clarification you may have. Thanks :)