search

hl7-be / allergy

Allergy package from the Patient Dossier
Other
0 stars 1 forks source link

Use of 'Be' resources #111

Open hansdekeersmaecker opened 10 months ago

hansdekeersmaecker commented 10 months ago

For recorder, there is a use of BePractitionar, BePractitionarRole & BePatient in the references.

But for other references, there seems to be no reference to 'Be' resources: Asserter:

Screenshot 2024-01-16 at 08 53 33

In the note annotation

Screenshot 2024-01-16 at 08 54 00

I do suppose it is the purpose to identify the practitionars for example with the identifiers specified in the Be profile? Or use the other Belgian specific extensions on these Be profiles? Shouldn't always the 'Be' be specified in this case?

bdc-ehealth commented 10 months ago

@hansdekeersmaecker ,

The Belgian profiles can be used on a technical level. So, this is a non blocking issue. If you want to modify this in the standard, this can be done after discussion in the HL7 workgroup on allergy. We follow the FHIR Governance in that respect.

KarlienHL7Belgium commented 7 months ago

WG agrees on these changes and they will be part of the next iteration