It would be useful if it prints the actual respective prior and bounds (or have another method to do this). This is a common misconception in our group. I always have to remind them to check ta.lpf.ps[i].prior for each i to just make sure what is the actual prior used.
Currently,
ta.lpf.ps
prints:It would be useful if it prints the actual respective prior and bounds (or have another method to do this). This is a common misconception in our group. I always have to remind them to check
ta.lpf.ps[i].prior
for each i to just make sure what is the actual prior used.