Closed ChrisWaloszek closed 4 years ago
Interesting. In general, putting stars after the estimate rather than the standard error seems to be the standard.
Truly the standard is different. When using error_pos = "same"
the estimate, stars, and p-value appear very close to another which is nice.
When using error_pos = "right"
the p-value appears more to the right as all columns are spaced equally.
Would it be an alternative solution to use error_pos = "same"
but with all cell contents aligned to the decimal of the estimate (including also the statistics below)?
There I think error_pos = "below"
would do it. Or you could tweak column
spacing with *_padding
properties.
With the number of variables in the table, error_pos = "below"
makes my tables very long and too long to display on a single page in landscape format.
Thus, all in one row (estimate, stars, p-value), their alignment according to the decimal of the estimate and then sufficient padding between the columns would great improve readability.
Sorry; I think this is just too much of a special case for huxreg()
to deal with. I recommend using padding to get what you want.
When using
error_pos = "same"
, the standard errors are displayed in the same cell as the estimates. However, the significance stars are located before the p-value in brackets, such that the estimates are not very nicely aligned:To improve the alignment when using
error_pos = "same"
, would it be possible to have the significance stars after the brackets? I.e. to have something more like the following: