Open smvdn opened 1 year ago
Besu and GoQuorum are interoperable if using QBFT so it shouldn't need migrating.
If using IBFT or another consensus mechanism, there is no migration tool, however it would still technically be possible by replaying transactions.
Tessera works with Besu as well, so should be no need to migrate the Tessera data.
Maybe @macfarla and @pinges can confirm if I've missed anything.
Besu and GoQuorum are interoperable if using QBFT so it shouldn't need migrating.
If using IBFT or another consensus mechanism, there is no migration tool, however it would still technically be possible by replaying transactions.
Tessera works with Besu as well, so should be no need to migrate the Tessera data.
Maybe @macfarla and @pinges can confirm if I've missed anything.
@siladu @macfarla @pinges
On the environment setup perspective, we are GoQuorum node having IBFT consensus with Internal Private Transactions. PMT's are not yet implemented. I am looking for replacing all my Quorum nodes with Besu.
I believe below are some of the key differences between both EVM implementations.
Will it be possible to migrate from Quorum to Besu without losing the current private transactions?
Discussion
Besu document describes migration from a different Ethereum based client to Besu. Currently we are using a Quorum based Ethereum client with private transactions. Would like to know if there are any constraints in migrating from Quorum to Bessu?
Also, what will happen with the private state data available in the GoQuorum and Tessera nodes. Is it possible to migrate the private state completely from Quorum to Besu?