Closed georgepadayatti closed 1 year ago
This would help in creating small indy networks in different parts of the world, and when the interoperability project succeeds, it will connect these networks creating a powerful alternative to PKI.
Would the changes made in the PR #1689 be sufficient for this Issue?
Hi @georgepadayatti , could you please guide me more on how to solve this issue ?
@georgepadayatti, @ggold7046, I believe this documentation covers this issue. There is a bit of clean-up but it covers creating a new network. https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-node/pull/1814
Hi @georgepadayatti , could you please guide me more on how to solve this issue ?
Hi there, do go through the PR referenced by @WadeBarnes in the comment.
I have also created a node operator guide available at https://github.com/decentralised-dataexchange/nordxdataspace/blob/main/docs/node-operator-guide.md
Please feel free to go through the guide, raise issues. I can try to answer them.
Hope this helps.
@georgepadayatti, @ggold7046, I believe this documentation covers this issue. There is a bit of clean-up but it covers creating a new network. https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-node/pull/1814
Will definitely check this out.
There should be proper documentation provided to run production capable indy network and guidance on governance capabilities. It should be structured in such a way that any entity should be equipped to run their own indy network. Current documentation is very much scattered, that an entity would have to rely on third parties to understand the steps. Proper documentation is very much required if we have to spread the SSI movement across boundaries.