Open EnocMartinez opened 4 years ago
Dear @EnocMartinez could you please check whether the assigned labels fit as use cases for your user story? Please check this table to find a better or additional use case which matches better your user story.
Dear @mabablue, these labels look fine for this user story.
As a...
instrument integrator / data manager
I want to...
Create standardized identifiers for observable properties which contain not only the variable to be measured (e.g. sea water temperature), but also add relevant information about the context (e.g. measured at 20 m depth) within the identifier itself
So that...
they do not share the exact same identifier, but are still grouped by property. If they have the same identifier (sea_water_temperature) some systems can get "confused" and mix datasets or simply reject new data with the same observable property (e.g. Sensor Observation Service).
Examples:
Domain(s)
Ocean observing systems (however it can be applied to any complex observable property, regardless the domain)
Addition Information
Sometimes I use controlled vocabulary links with URL parameters as a workaround:
e.g. http://mmisw.org/ont/cf/parameter/sea_water_temperature?depth=20m
However in this example "depth" and "m" can be easily interpreted by humans, but it is not a strong semantic definition. An alternative could be to use vocabularies for "depth" and "meters":
However the identifiers grows to a huge and ugly url no longer readable by humans:
http://mmisw.org/ont/cf/parameter/sea_water_temperature?http://mmisw.org/ont/cf/parameter/depth =20http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P06/current/ULAA/