In some cases, due either to an adversarial network or more innocent reasons,
the query to the "tamperproof" external resolver might be blocked and never
return an answer. I think with a close reading of the document this is OK
because "clients MUST resolve the Verification Record for that name" and in the
blocked case, it won't be resolved and so the MUST won't be fulfilled.
Nonetheless, I wonder if it would be worth adding a few sentences about this
case.