Closed JustAnotherArchivist closed 2 years ago
Since it's present in the BNF final drafts and the missing chunk of text aligns exactly to a page boundary I'm assuming it was unintentionally missed during the creation of the markdown file. I've added it back.
The WARC/1.0 specification contained the following sentence in the response record definition:
As far as I can see, the 1.1 spec does not have an equivalent statement. The definition of
WARC-Truncated
only mentions that the field may be used to indicate truncated responses. Revisit records with identical payloads are required to use theWARC-Truncated
field, but this obviously doesn't apply to all other reasons for truncation, like timeouts or size limits.