codecov-commenter
commented
2 years ago Codecov Report
Base: 22.23% // Head: 22.23% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:
Coverage data is based on head (
ce9d3a5) compared to base (0d9df8e). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.:exclamation: Current head ce9d3a5 differs from pull request most recent head 2ea4076. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2ea4076 to get more accurate results
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #233 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 22.23% 22.23% ======================================= Files 17 17 Lines 1781 1781 ======================================= Hits 396 396 Misses 1385 1385 ``` Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=imagej). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=imagej):umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Closes #200, #198
But we still need to figure out what "preserving image metadata" means in many cases. With the name, it's obvious, as both data structures have that as state. With other metadata like
ImageMetadata, it's less obvious.But discussion should go in #200