Open cgendreau opened 7 years ago
It's worth considering. I do think it is a specification that is originally coming from Cerberus. @stijnvanhoey would know it is useful to stick to that or not.
There is no specific reason to stick to the naming of Cerberus, as this is just a possible base to implement the validation of whip-specification files. If there is a good alternative to allowed
it is certainly worth to consider and there shouldn't be a technical limitation in terms of implementation.
If we look at the current specification types, only
allowed
is an adjective:That been said, I don't have any super suggestion other than something like simply
value
orallowedvalue
(which is not pretty as one word).Please treat that as a question/idea/suggestion, I'm not a native English speaker.