Closed Wackerbarth closed 5 years ago
I would suggest that yes, we should match that for the time being. When OctoPrint 1.4.x comes out and we have a Redeem communication plugin, we'll rework the whole concept to get better feedback about the current print status to OctoPrint. Maybe even manage to let the gcode viewer sync feature work.
Our response to
M23
isFile opened:/usr/share/models/calibration-cube.gcode Lines:16720 Size:443908B
but, Octoprint is expecting only the file name and size. (Probably because counting lines is too "expensive" on an Arduino board)File opened:/usr/share/models/calibration-cube.gcode Size:443908
Do we want to change our response to match that expectation?