Closed lindhe closed 3 weeks ago
Normally I would recommend following a similar pattern as Bitnami do with existingClaim
, especially for charts like this one that depends on Bitnami charts. But turns out that would introduce a lot of extra logic for us compared to this very minimal change, since we already have a name
field for the PVC.
I'm pretty sure my current implementation is a non-breaking change.
Looking forward to your input on this!
Description
This change enables users to provide their own PVC for storing data, rather than forcing them to create a new one. This can be a handy way to decouple the lifecycle management of data from the app, for example to perform backup/restore operations.
Checklist
Ticks in all boxes and 🟢 on all GitHub actions status checks are required to merge:
Reminder
By using GitHub, you have already agreed to the GitHub’s Terms of Service including that: