Open valosekj opened 11 months ago
Similar to sub-mon118 Similarly to the above subject (sub_mon118), the following files were found to have similar issue of data quality:
In the above images, we can see the shift from black to white, from one slide to another
Blurry image The following subject has a very blurry image:
Motion The following subject has very strong motion on alternating slices :
sub-tor133_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz: Should it be discarded ?
Yes I would say so
p.s. I suggest to create one post per subject (instead of showing multiple subjects per post), so that we can more easily cross-ref one subject with a unique URL (eg: in the exclude.yml file, when communicating with Shannon, etc.)
sub-van206_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz Should it be disccarded and included in the exlude.yml file ?
Yes, please, include the image to the exlude.yml file
sub-tor133_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz Should it be discarded ?
Yes, please, include the image to the exlude.yml file
Referencing a data quality issue for sub-mon006_ses-M0
which was previously described in this issue
sub-mon006
- has FOV covering the whole brain. The SC has only C1-C6Problem with sub_mon009_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
. Linked to a strong motion artifact.
Similar image quality problem as in issue 43 for image sub-mon118_ses-M0
Image added to exclude.yml
to exclude it in future works.
Problem with sub_mon032_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
. Linked to a strong motion artifact.
Similar image quality problem as in issue 43 for image sub-mon118_ses-M0
Image added to exclude.yml
to exclude it in future works.
Problem with sub_mon097_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
. Linked to a strong motion artifact.
Similar image quality problem as in issue 43 for image sub-mon118_ses-M0
Image added to exclude.yml
to exclude it in future works.
Problem with sub_mon148_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
. Linked to a strong motion artifact.
Similar image quality problem as in issue 43 for image sub-mon118_ses-M0
Image added to exclude.yml
to exclude it in future works.
Problem with sub_mon168_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
. Linked to a strong motion artifact.
Similar image quality problem as in issue 43 for image sub-mon118_ses-M0
Image added to exclude.yml
to exclude it in future works.
Problem with sub_mon191_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
. Linked to a strong motion artifact.
Similar image quality problem as in issue 43 for image sub-mon118_ses-M0
Image added to exclude.yml
to exclude it in future works.
Problem with sub_van176_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
. Linked to a strong motion artifact.
Similar image quality problem as in issue 43 for image sub-mon118_ses-M0
Image added to exclude.yml
to exclude it in future works.
Problem with sub_van206_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
. The image is very blury as it can be seen in the below GIF:
Image added to exclude.yml
to exclude it in future works.
Problem with sub_tor133_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
. There is a very big motion which can be seen on alternating slices. It can be seen in the below GIF:
Image added to exclude.yml
to exclude it in future works.
sub-tor090_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
- strong motion artifact. SC seg apparently works, but disc labeling is tricky - keeping for now:sub-tor092_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
- motion between slices - SC still visible - keeping for now:Poor image quality reported while doing QC in this post (link):
sub-mon113_ses-M0
[x] Need to exclude it : and add to exclude.yml
Poor image quality reported while doing QC in this post (link):
sub-mon138_ses-M0
The quality is poor, but the spinal cord is still visible. Keeping it for now
Poor image quality reported while doing QC in this post (link):
sub-mon152_ses-M0
[x] Need to exclude it : and add to exclude.yml
Poor image quality reported while doing QC in this post (link): motion on alternating slices
sub-van156_ses-M0
SC segmentation didn't work well, but SC is pretty visible: keeping it for now
p.s. for all the subjects showing motion across odd/even slices, there is a "simple" pre-processing method we could implement, which consists in co-registering the odd and even slices.
p.s. for all the subjects showing motion across odd/even slices, there is a "simple" pre-processing method we could implement, which consists in co-registering the odd and even slices.
Good point! Cross-referring relevant issue: https://github.com/ivadomed/canproco/issues/19
sub-mon175_ses-M0
has poor image quality
Keeping it for now as SC is still visible
Subject sub-tor014
should be removed : too blury
exclude.yml
filesub-van134_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
imposible to perform disc labeling:Keeping it for now as SC is still visible
sub-van135_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
imposible to perform disc labeling:Keeping it for now as SC is still visible
sub-van154_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
- motion between slices - SC still visible - keeping for now:sub-van171_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
imposible to perform disc labeling:Keeping it for now as SC is still visible
sub-van207_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
imposible to perform disc labeling:Keeping it for now as SC is still visible
Impossible to perform disc_labeling on subject sub-van181_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
Keeping it as SC is still visible.
Impossible to perform disc_labeling on subject sub-van201_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
Subject sub-mon050_ses-M0_PSIR
has strong motion : added to exclude.yml
file
Small motion artifact on sub-mon118_ses-M12 making lesion detection/segmentation too complicated
Motion artefact on sub-mon077_ses-M0
.
Should we add it to the exclude.yml
?
Motion artefact on
sub-mon077_ses-M0
. Should we add it to theexclude.yml
?
Yes, I think so!
Small motion artefact on sub-mon029_ses-M0
:
Small motion artefact on
sub-mon029_ses-M0
:
I added this one and the previous one as well.
sub-mon104_ses-M0
Good catch! Added as well!
sub-mon001_ses-M0
As we can see the spinal cord, I'm not sure if we should put it on exclude.yml
.
Hum, that's a good question! I would suggest not adding it to the exclude.yml
since the image is good enough to obtain both a SC seg and a lesion seg (and the subject has lesions). What do you think @valosekj @jcohenadad ?
I would suggest not adding it to the exclude.yml since the image is good enough to obtain both a SC seg and a lesion seg (and the subject has lesions).
agreed
sub-mon036_ses-M0
: The segmentation of the spinal cord seems alright.
sub-mon055_ses-M12
:The segmentation is bad. Added to exclude.yml
sub-mon150_ses-M12
: Added to exclude.yml
sub-mon185_ses-M12
The segmentation fails but the lesions are visible. Keeping it for now.
sub-mon034_ses-M0
The segmentation of the spinal cord seems alright.
sub-mon096_ses-M12
Added to exclude.yml
Referencing a previous file sub-mon052_ses-M0
which has already been added : link
This issue summarizes PSIR images with poor data quality.
sub-mon118_ses-M0_PSIR.nii.gz
- severe motion artifact (original issue here) - added to exclude.yml