Closed DrMarkGS closed 1 year ago
@JohnnyDoorn - Just noticed the same post-hoc problems in one way RMANOVA i.e. putting an X in front of the level
@DrMarkGS, I apologize for the late reply. I couldn't reproduce your problem with the latest JASP version. Can you?
Hi Julius Seems fine in 0.16.4 Mark
From: Julius Pfadt @.> Sent: 29 November 2022 11:45 To: jasp-stats/jasp-issues @.> Cc: Mark Goss-Sampson @.>; Mention @.> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [jasp-stats/jasp-issues] 2 way mixed factor ANOVA bugs (#1080)
https://github.com/DrMarkGS This message originated from outside the University. Treat links and attachments with caution.
https://github.com/DrMarkGS https://github.com/DrMarkGS
@DrMarkGShttps://github.com/DrMarkGS, I apologize for the late reply. I couldn't reproduce your problem with the latest JASP version. Can you?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/issues/1080#issuecomment-1330501135, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJJSHACEGS3PJTVSG4L6U33WKXUC3ANCNFSM4UDQUWQQ. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.**@.>>
University of Greenwich, a charity and company limited by guarantee, registered in England (reg no. 986729). Registered Office: Old Royal Naval College, Park Row, Greenwich SE10 9LS.
thank you for the swift reply!!!
If this is not unchecked the analysis runs but the labelling in the post hoc table changes 30% 50% and 70% to X30, X50 and X70
2 way Mixed ANOVA for Amsterdam.zip Data file attached
Cheers Mark